Legal Opinion
Stevens v. Manchester
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 11, 1998No. 97APE09-1159PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petree, Judge.
Defendants, Carol A. Manchester, Therese M. Bonin, Bonin-Manchester Partnership, and EZRA, Inc., appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of plaintiff, Richard A. Stevens. Defendants set forth the following assignments of error:
“[I.] The trial court erred as a matter of law in finding that the sellers’ attorneys did not act in good faith when disapproving the Stevens offer because, as the court itself found, the Stevens offer contained a purchase price allocation provision that ‘certainly would permit in and of itself, without anything else,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kenty v. Transamerica Premium InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- McKenna v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Ulrich v. DalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harbor Park Market, Inc v. GrondaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ner Tamid Congregation of N. Town v. KrivoruchkoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Kellie Auto Sales, Inc. v. Rahbars & Ritters Enterprises, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kellie Auto Sales v. Rahbars Ritters Ents., 06ap-1243 (8-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007