Legal Opinion
Peck v. MILFORD HUNT HOMEOWNERS ASS'N
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 2, 2008No. AC 28896PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, the Milford Hunt Homeowners Association, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, resolving a dispute over a billboard lease in favor of the plaintiff, Arnold Peck. The defendant claims that the court (1) failed to apply the provisions of General Statutes § 47-247 1 properly so as to allow the termination of the lease and (2) improperly concluded that the lease was not unconscionable or commercially unreasonable. We conclude that the provisions of § 47-247 do not apply under the circumstances of this case and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Flagg Energy Development Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Alvord Investment, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Weldy v. Northbrook Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Wiltzius v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Benson v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF WESTPORTConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Levine v. LiverisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- State v. CusterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Kohl's Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Rocky HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020