Legal Opinion

Sheerin v. Exxon Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 30, 1997No. 01-95-00318-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUTSON-DUNN, Justice (Retired).

The Court previously considered whether the transcript in this appeal was timely filed. 1 Sheerin v. Exxon Corp., 923 S.W.2d 52 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, order). We ordered the Clerk of the Court to file the transcript based on our interpretation of Mafrige v. Ross, 2 and we proceeded to submit the cause on the merits. Sheerin, 923 S.W.2d at 55-56. Since that time, the supreme court has held that (1) a summary judgment which erroneously grants more relief than was requested in the motion for summary judgment and contains a Mother Hubbard clause…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Inglish v. Union State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Knight v. Sam Houston Memorial Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kaigler v. General Electric Mortgage Insurance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  2. Kaigler v. General Electric Mortgage Insurance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API