Legal Opinion
Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Weir
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error to Saginaw. Assumpsit. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
The manner in which this case is submitted makes the record present substantially this question: Whether in the court below there was any evidence tending to prove the plaintiff’s case? The action was begun in justices’ court, and the declaration is as follows:
“Saginaw County — ss. John B. Weir, plaintiff herein, complains of the Flint and Pere Marquette Railway Company, defendant herein, in a plea of trespass on the case upon promises; for that whereas, the said defendant, before and at the time of the delivery of the goods and chattels to said defendant, as hereinafter mentioned, was and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- The Steamboat New World v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Jacobus v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- Nolton v. . Western Railroad CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. McGownTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- LaBrasca v. HinchmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Littlejohn v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Way v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Demarest v. Palisaides Realty & Amusement Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.