Legal Opinion

Rinehart v. Rinehart

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1925No. C. C. 329PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Pbesident:

Mary Margaret McGuffie, deceased, in her last will bequeathed a legacy of $1,000.00 to Henrietta Rinehart, the complainant herein. The latter filed her bill asking that her general pecuniary legacy be decreed to be a charge upon the real estate devised by the testatrix in the residuary clause of her will to Agnes Rinehart, one of the defendants herein, and Isabel McGuffie, now deceased. She also asks for an accounting by the executor appointed in said will. A. B. Rine-hart, as such executor, and Agnes Rinehart, one of the residuary beneficiaries under the will, demurred to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morris v. . SicklyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Brill v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Briggs v. . CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Bird v. StoutWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Swift v. EdsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harris v. EskridgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Nashville Trust Co. v. GrimesTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Peters v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Whitehurst v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. Ganahl v. GanahlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API