Legal Opinion
Vannatta v. Keisling
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 13, 1995No. Civ. 94-1541-JOPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge:
This lawsuit involves a federal constitutional challenge to Ballot Measures 6 and 9 which amended the Oregon Constitution. This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ (# 9) and Defendants’ (# 25) Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment on the constitutionality of Measure 6, 1 as well as Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (# 60), Motion for Leave to File an Additional Affidavit (# 61), and Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (#57). 2
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On November 8, 1994, Oregon voters passed Measure 6 which essentially limits the amount of campaign…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Montana Right to Life Ass'n v. EddlemanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1998
- AFMS LLC v. United Parcel Service Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Democratic National Committee v. WatadaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2002
- Green v. MorthamDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.