Legal Opinion

In re Mero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding to settle an account of the public administrator and set counsel fees pursuant to SCPA 2110, Godosky & Gentile, PC., trial counsel to the Public Administrator of Kings County, appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a decree and judgment (one paper) of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Lopez Torres, S.), dated May 19, 2008, as awarded it an attorney’s fee in the principal sum of only $436,598.23.

*1004Ordered that the decree and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“[T]he Surrogate bears the ultimate responsibility of deciding what constitutes a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. In re the Estate of BobeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re the Estate of PiterniakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Pekofsky v. Estate of CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re the Estate of DrossosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API