Legal Opinion
MERCED
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1974No. 2273PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2273 MATTER OF MERCED In Deportation Proceedings A-20127277 A-19571758 Decided by Board March 21, 1974 The grantingto an alien, after he has become deportable, of permission to iemiin in the United States until further notice as the beneficiary of an s approved visa petition in accordance with Operations Instruction 242.10(a) does not confer on the alien beneficiary any irrevocable right or privilege and does not preclude the district director from instituting deportation proceed- ings, in his discretion, against the alien. CHARGE: Act of 1952—Seetion 241(a)(2) IS U.S.C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- GERONIMOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1971
- Mary Bowes v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Allan Gordon Armstrong v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vincenzo Spata, Giuseppa Spata and Angelo Spata v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Juana Zoraida Lopez-Telles v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- QUINTEROBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
- TORRESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1986
- YAZDANIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981
- Verena Del Rosario Kalal v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.