Legal Opinion

National Organization for Women v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 14, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-2879PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FLANNERY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff National Organization for Women (“NOW”) and the other plaintiffs in this action to remand this case to the District of Columbia Superior Court on the ground that diversity jurisdiction does not lie in this court because the amount in controversy does not exceed $10,000.

I. Background

This is a class action in which the plaintiffs are NOW on behalf of itself and its members, and two named plaintiffs, Kathy Bonk and Vickey Monrean on behalf of themselves and all other women similarly situated.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In Re Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Breakman v. AOL LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M STREET LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Susan J. Friedman v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Garza v. Bettcher Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API