Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 30, 1970No. 51239, 51240PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBranchfield, J.
Defendant was charged with two different violations of the Air Quality Control Code of the city of Portland. It was found guilty in municipal court and appealed to the circuit court for Multnomah County. Upon trial in circuit court without a jury, defendant was again found guilty in both cases.
The defendant’s first assignment of error is as follows:
“The ordinance under which the defendant was convicted and fined is void because it violates the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, and Article I, Section 20 of the Constitution of the State of Oregon in that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Northwestern Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State v. Mundet Cork Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- People v. International Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Sittner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bortz Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Southern Illinois Asphalt Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Air Pollution Variance Board v. Western Alfalfa Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.