Legal Opinion

Krause v. Rutherford

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action upon an undertaking.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

This action is to recover on an undertaking, executed by James R. Rutherford as principal, with the defendants Smith and Wood as sureties for said Rutherford. The undertaking was given to obtain an order of arrest against several defendants named therein, charged with criminal negligence in over-driving and injuring a team of horses owned by the defendant Rutherford. James R. Rutherford was the plaintiff in the original action against the present plaintiff, who was one of the defendants in said action. The plaintiff was taken by the sheriff, upon said order of arrest, and was imprisoned from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Binsse v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Krause v. RutherfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Squire v. McDonaldNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buffalo Savings Bank v. Threeinwon Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Heinemann v. BraschNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API