Legal Opinion

Buffalo Savings Bank v. Threeinwon Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1940Published

1Opinion of the CourtSwift, J.

Upon these motions both the plaintiff and the defendant Israel ask for summary judgment.

The plaintiff, owner and holder of a bond and mortgage, brings this action upon the bond to recover the amount of taxes paid by it. The defendant Israel is the original mortgagor and obligor, and the defendant Threeinwon Realty Corporation, his grantee, assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage.

The first defense, pleaded by both defendants, is that the action is premature because prior to its inception plaintiff made no demand for repayment of the taxes paid by it. The mortgage provided that the mortgagor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Becker v. FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Marshall v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Pain v. PackardNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. King v. BaldwinNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  5. Marsh v. PikeNew York Court of Chancery · 1844

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API