Legal Opinion

Evr-Klean Seat Pad Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1941No. 11784PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for patent infringement. The trial court dismissed it on the ground that the patent was invalid, and plaintiff has appealed.

The patent involved is Reissue No. 16,-288, dated March 9, 1926, on improvements in slip covers for automobile seats, in fav- or of Rufus R. Eddins, held by plaintiff as assignee.

The specifications made provision for an independent cover-section for the seat cushion, and one for the back, each with a matting panel of interwoven strands of grass, cane or other vegetable fiber, covering the cushion surface, reinforced along the edges,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Florsheim v. SchillingSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Western Willite Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Anakin Lock Works v. Dillon Lock WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. Goldman v. PolanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Griffith Rubber Mills, a Corporation v. Henry S. HoffarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. L. S. Donaldson Company and G. Barr and Company v. La Maur, Inc., La Maur, Inc. v. G. Barr and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. Electro Mfg. Co. v. YellinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API