Legal Opinion
Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1943No. 9392PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal attacks a decree finding invalid for want of invention Grebe & Sanford patent, 1,877,504, of which appellant is assignee. The patent covers a method and process of “treatment of deep wells.” By stipulation, of the parties two other patents relating to the same subject, Grebe, 1,916,122, arid Grebe & Stoesserj 1,998,756, were sustained, and the court found that the appellee infringed certain of the claims of each of them. The complaint was dismissed as to Chamberlain patent, 2,024,718, but appellant has not questioned this action here. A counterclaim filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Grayson v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Williams Bros. Well Treating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- O'LEARY v. Liggett Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Faulkner v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Dale Hilton, Inc. v. Triangle Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.