Legal Opinion

In re Rushing

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 14, 2012No. 2012-B-1172PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*285ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

| ¶ Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 21, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) has filed a petition seeking the imposition of reciprocal discipline against respondent, Steven L. Rushing,1 an attorney licensed to practice law in the States of Louisiana and Texas, based upon discipline imposed in two separate proceedings in Texas.

UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In November 2000, Loyd Watts hired respondent to file a civil suit on his behalf. Respondent subsequently failed to file the suit and failed to communicate with Mr. Watts.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re AulstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  3. In Re KanwalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. In Re RushingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re RushingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API