Legal Opinion

Hoefs v. Sig Sauer Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 17, 2021No. 3:20-cv-05173Unknown

1Opinion

1 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 CODY J. HOEFS, 11 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-05173-RAJ 12 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 AND DENYING IN PART SIG SAUER INC., MOTION TO DISMISS 14 Defendant. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 18 First Amended Complaint. Dkt. # 16. Having considered the submissions of the parties, 19 the relevant portions of the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that oral 20 argument is unnecessary. For the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API