Legal Opinion

Croasdale v. Butell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1955No. 39,603PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This action was instituted by the plaintiff, who is conceded to have a life estate interest in the real estate involved, to recover treble damages, pursuant to G. S. 1949, 21-2435, from the two persons named as defendants, for the unauthorized cutting and converting of grass. Separate demurrers to the petition, each based on grounds (1) plaintiff had no legal capacity to sue and (2) the petition failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of plaintiff and against either defendant, were overruled, hence this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sharp v. McColmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Wood v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Alexander v. GoellertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Smith v. LeightonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Zane v. International Hod Carriers, Building & Common Laborers' UnionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Galleher v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Schaper v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. In Re Rahfeldt's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. Daniel v. LebenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API