Legal Opinion

Adhesive Technologies v. Rapid

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided May 26, 2011No. 10-CV-075-SMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Adhesive Technologies v. Rapid 10-CV-075-SM 5/26/11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Adhesive Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff v. Case No. 10-cv-75-SM Opinion No. 2 011 DNH 085 Isaberq Rapid A B , Defendant O R D E R Plaintiff, Adhesive Technologies, Inc. ("Ad-Tech"), located in Hampton, New Hampshire, agreed to provide the engineering design for, and to manufacture, customized glue guns for Defendant Isaberg Rapid AB ("Rapid"), a Swedish corporation. The glue guns were designed and manufactured by Ad-Tech, but, Ad-Tech says. Rapid did not live up to its end of the bargain.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API