Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Syntex Agri-Business, Inc. v. Adolf

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1985No. 50536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Relators sought our writ of prohibition to prevent the production during discovery of documents claimed to be privileged.

*887The underlying lawsuit was brought by a large number of plaintiffs to recover for damages allegedly sustained from exposure to dioxin. Relators are four members of a corporate family. Syntex Corporation is the parent company. Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary. Syntex Agribusiness, Inc. and Syntex Laboratories, Inc. are wholly owned subsidiaries of Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc. All four, along with individuals and other corporations, are defendants in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Terminal Railroad v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Apt v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wohl v. SpragueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State ex rel. L.Y. v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell Humphrey & Co. v. ProvaznikMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Lause v. AdolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API