State ex rel. L.Y. v. Davis
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Presiding Judge.
This is an action in prohibition. The respondent circuit judge has ordered relator, L.Y., a defendant in the action below, to produce information relator gave to the Missouri Bar Plan, relator’s professional liability carrier. Relator seeks our writ to prohibit respondent from enforcing his order. We have issued our preliminary writ and now make it permanent.
In the underlying action, the plaintiff is suing relator for negligence based on relator’s alleged failure to defend an action and allowing a default judgment to be entered against the plaintiff. In the course of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Anheuser v. NolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Thomas v. HarrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. HuntMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- May Department Stores Co. v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Collom v. FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State ex rel. Papin Builders, Inc. v. LitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Keefe Commissary Network, LLC v. Beazley Insurance Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021