Chandler v. Roe
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from- Superior Court, Músico gee County; Farrar L. McCain, Juáge. Action by Elizabeth Roe against Marshall Roe and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Charles H. Chandler brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
THACKER, C.
The plaintiff in error anl Marshall Roe, one of the defendants in error, will be designated as' defendants, and Elizabeth Roe, the other defendant in error, as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court. On July 27, 1910, plaintiff commenced this action, alleging, SO' far as material to this opinion, in substance and effect: (1) That she is the owner and entitled to be adjudged both the title and possession of the E. y<¿ of the N. E. % of section 27, township 16 N., range 15 E., the same being surplus lands allotted to her as a Creek freedwoman, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bruner Et Ux. v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lewis v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Scott v. Signal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Trapnall's adx. v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
- Newton v. RebenackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Campbell v. McGrathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Mehard v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Littlefield v. AikenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928