Legal Opinion

Smurfit Newsprint Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2000No. OTC 4298; SC S46114PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

In this direct appeal from the Oregon Tax Court, the issue is whether, on cross-motions for summary judgment, the Tax Court erred in denying taxpayer’s motion and granting the Department of Revenue’s (department) motion. Taxpayer moved for summary judgment on the ground that the department had made a tax assessment based on a deficiency in 1986, a year that was closed to assessment under ORS 314.410. The department moved for summary judgment on the ground that it was permitted to recalculate taxpayer’s tax liability in 1986 to determine the correct amount of pollution control facility (PCF)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Western Generation Agency v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Simpson Timber Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Smurfit Newsprint Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1998

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. White v. Jubitz Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Anderson v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Lindsey v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Hillenga v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API