Legal Opinion

Smurfit Newsprint Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided December 23, 1998No. TC 4298PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

Plaintiff (taxpayer) appeals from deficiency assessments for corporate excise taxes for 1987 and 1988. The assessments resulted when Defendant (department) reduced the amount of tax credits carried over from 1986. Although 1986 was a “closed year,” 1 the department recalculated taxpayer’s income for that year and adjusted the amount of tax credits that could be carried over to 1987 and 1988. Taxpayer claims that the department is essentially assessing a deficiency for 1986, which is prohibited by statute. The facts are undisputed and the matter has been submitted to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. International Health & Life Insurance v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. International Health & Life Insurance Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1973
  4. Krahmer v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smurfit Newsprint Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hillenga v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Tektronix, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2001
  4. Hillenga v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API