Legal Opinion

McDowell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 31, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Two questions are presented by this workmen’s compensation appeal:(1) May a claimant who was awarded permanent total disability prior to the 1965 amendments to the Workmen’s Compensation Law appeal from an own-motion order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board issued in 1971 reducing claimant’s award to permanent partial disability, and, if so, (2) may claimant prosecute such appeal against the State Accident Insurance Fund rather than the Workmen’s Compensation Board?

Defendant, State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF), appeals from a jury verdict which found the claimant permanently and totally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hinkle v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Murray v. LambOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Whitney v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Verban v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosenstiel v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Cox v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Thornsberry v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. SAIF Corporation v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API