Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Young

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1929No. 8 Div. 129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appeal seeks a review of the ruling sustaining defendant’s demurrers to plaintiff’s petition for mandamus.

The several demurrers are properly grouped by the trial court. The court was correct in the holding that the petition for the writ to enforce a mere private right was properly filed in the name of Sanders. Bryce v. Burke, Probate Judge, 172 Ala. 219, 231, 55 So. 635; Hasty v. Marengo County Bank, 206 Ala. 280, 89 So. 433.

The petition was not required to set out in full or state the provisions of the act creating the inferior court of Huntsville. Being a local, and not a private, law,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bryce v. BurkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Compton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Hasty v. Marengo County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chilton County v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Morgan County v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API