Legal Opinion

Compton v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Feom tbe Circuit Court of Clarke. Tried before tbe Hon. Wi. E. Clarke. cited and relied on Garl v. State, 87 Ala. 17; Knowles v. State, 80 Ala. 9. cited Code, § 403*7; Williams v. State, 91 Ala. 14; Garl v. Stale, 89 Ala. 93; Garson v. State, 69 Ala. 235; Gom. v. Kimball, 24 Pick. 366; Com. v. Halleti, 103 Mass. 452; 2 Wliart. Or. Law, 9th eel., 1506.

1Opinion of the CourtThobington, J.

Appellant was convicted under an indictment charging him with selling spiritous, vinous or malt liquors, without a license, and contrary to law.

The testimony for the State, as the bill of exceptions recites, tended to show that appellant sold “McLean’s Strengthening Cordial” and “Ginger Tonic”; that they were articles containing sufficient alcohol to produce intoxication; that persons bought them of appellant for the purpose of using them as a beverage “and did so use them and get drunk on them”; that appellant kept on hand a large quantity of said articles, which he sold regularly in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Commonwealth v. HallettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Carl v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. Black v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. SookeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Guarreno v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API