Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Caledonia National Bank

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 13, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an action of contract brought by Earle C. Hayden against the Caledonia National Bank to Washington County Court. The defendant appeared specially and, after the time for dilatory pleading had expired, filed a motion to dismiss. This motion was denied and the plaintiff’s motion to amend the writ was granted. The case is here upon the defendant’s exceptions to the action of the court in denying its motion to dismiss.

Insofar as material here the United States Code, 12 U. S. C. A. § 91, provides that: “ * * * and no attachment * * * shall be issued against such association or its property…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  3. Aiken v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
  4. Caldbeck v. SimantonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  5. Roy v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. KogutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  2. Hayden v. Caledonia National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  4. Mowle v. Town of SherburneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API