Legal Opinion
Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 27, 1935No. 5756PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court refusing a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendant from prosecuting certain suits which it had brought in the Northern District of Ohio- and in the Northern District of Indiana.
A. P. Steckel filed an application on June 30, 1923, for a patent for “a revolutionary advance in the art of rolling thin sheet metal.” Steckel assigned this application to the plaintiff, the Cold Metal Process Company, hereinafter called “Cold Metal.” On April 20, 1926, Biggert and Johnson filed a conflicting application which was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. UNITED STATES ENG. & FOUNDRY CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
- Memphis City v. DeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United Engineering & Foundry Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.