Legal Opinion

Bath & Body Works, Inc., and Bathco, Inc. v. Luzier Personalized Cosmetics, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1996No. 94-3677PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, Bath & Body Works, Inc., and Bathco, Inc., (collectively “Bath & Body Works”), appeal the judgment on a jury verdict for the defendant, Luzier Personalized Cosmetics, Inc., in this action alleging trade dress infringement. Bath & Body Works claims that several evidentiary rulings and certain jury instructions were erroneous. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the decision of the district court.

I

Since 1990, Bath & Body Works has been a nationwide retailer of personal care products. The business is a separate, wholly-owned subsidiary of The Limited, Inc.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

In Re Bendectin Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
Aaron COOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CARMIKE CINEMAS, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
Opryland USA Inc. v. The Great American Music Show, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
Induct-O-Matic Corporation v. Inductotherm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
Blinded Veterans Ass'n v. Blinded American Veterans FoundationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Breed LogisticsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
Nartron Corporation v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
Door Systems, Incorporated v. Pro-Line Door Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
General Conference Corp. of Seventh-Day Adventists v. McGillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.