Legal Opinion
Application of Karl E. Prindle and Ross C. Reed
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 12, 1962No. Patent Appeals 6714Published
1Opinion of the Court
297 F.2d 251
Application of Karl E. PRINDLE and Ross C. Reed.
Patent Appeals No. 6714.
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
January 12, 1962.
Ely, Pearne & Gordon, Albert L. Ely, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.
Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (Raymond E. Martin, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.
Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.*
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
1
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection of claims 1 to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gillman v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hunger-Ford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In re LillichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.