Legal Opinion
DiNardo v. Koronowski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hayes, J.
The issue presented on appeal is whether, pursuant to CPLR 3101 (i), defendant must turn over surveillance tapes upon request by plaintiff prior to the completion of depositions. This issue is one of first impression before this Court. We hold that plaintiff is entitled to the surveillance tapes upon request, regardless of whether depositions have been completed.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Plaintiff moved to compel defendant to respond to a discovery demand for surveillance materials…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matisoff v. DobiNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Chamberlain v. . SpargurNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tai Tran v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Falk v. InzinnaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rotundi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Konviser v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.