Legal Opinion · Dissent

Citizens for Environmental Safety, Inc. v. Missouri Department of Natural Resources

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1999No. 22497Published

1DissentPhillip R. Garrison, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent. In the context of this case, I disagree with the interpretation of the word “shall” as being directory as opposed to mandatory. Section 260.205.2(3) provides that MDNR “shall” approve or deny an application for a permit within twenty-four consecutive months of its receipt. MDNR failed to do so here. In my view, as a result, MDNR lost jurisdiction over SRL’s permit application.

In construing statutory provisions we are to adhere to the primary rule of statutory construction, which is to ascertain the intent of the legislature from the language used, to give effect to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Cook v. PedigoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. MueggeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Deimeke v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API