Legal Opinion

City of Seven Hills v. Aryan Nations

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1996No. 95-730PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

This case presents the single issue of whether the permanent injunction’s prohibition on simultaneous picketing by groups with opposing viewpoints violates the United States Constitution’s guarantee of free speech.1 Seven Hills does not appeal the ruling that the ordinance was unconstitutional, nor does Weiss challenge the injunction’s registration requirements, time restrictions, or limitation on the number of picketers. For the following reasons, we reverse the *306court of appeals and find that the trial court abused its discretion in completely banning simultaneous expression of contrary…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Henry County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Connor Group v. RaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. United Auto Workers, Local Union 1112 v. PhilomenaOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of America v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API