Robertson v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*508JUSTICE BEATTY:
In this capital Post-Conviction Relief (“PCR”) case, James D. Robertson (“Petitioner”) filed a second PCR application alleging, among other things, that his prior PCR counsel were not qualified under section 17-27-160(B) of the South Carolina Code1 and failed to competently represent him. Without a hearing, the PCR judge dismissed the application on the grounds that it was successive and barred by the one-year statute of limitations and laches. This Court granted certiorari to review the circuit court’s dismissal of Petitioner’s application. Petitioner contends his second PCR…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Maples v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Aice v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Deleston v. NelsenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Fishburne v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
- Love v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
- Stephen Bryant v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025