Legal Opinion

Robertson v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 14, 2016No. Appellate Case 2012-205909; Opinion 27691PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*508JUSTICE BEATTY:

In this capital Post-Conviction Relief (“PCR”) case, James D. Robertson (“Petitioner”) filed a second PCR application alleging, among other things, that his prior PCR counsel were not qualified under section 17-27-160(B) of the South Carolina Code1 and failed to competently represent him. Without a hearing, the PCR judge dismissed the application on the grounds that it was successive and barred by the one-year statute of limitations and laches. This Court granted certiorari to review the circuit court’s dismissal of Petitioner’s application. Petitioner contends his second PCR…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Maples v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Aice v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Deleston v. NelsenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  3. Fishburne v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
  4. Love v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  5. Stephen Bryant v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API