Legal Opinion

Bennett Excavators Corp. v. Lasker Goldman Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

James S. Bbowít, J.

Plaintiff moves to dismiss pursuant to subdivisions 4 and 5 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, a claim against it by Standard Accident Insurance Co. (hereinafter called Standard) which was brought in as a party defendant to answer the counterclaim asserted by defendant Lasker-Groldman Corp. (hereinafter called Lasker) against the plaintiff and Standard.

Plaintiff’s action against Lasker is one to recover a balance due for work, labor and services performed and materials furnished. Lasker’s counterclaim against plaintiff and Standard is based on a breach by plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. D'Onofrio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Paretta v. White Acres Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Beck Chemical Equipment Corp. v. Beattie Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. Davis v. O'CallaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennett Excavators Corp. v. Lasker-Goldman Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API