Legal Opinion

Marjarum v. Township of Hamilton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 26, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

763 A.2d 796 (2000)

James MARJARUM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 6, 2000.

Decided December 26, 2000.

George T. Dougherty, Lawrenceville, argued the cause for appellant (Katz & Dougherty, attorneys; Mr. Dougherty, on the brief).

Bill Mathesius argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges BAIME and CARCHMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, P.J.A.D.

This appeal is from the Law Division's order directing Hamilton Township to remove from its personnel files all references to plaintiff's…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Curtis v. FinneranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. In Re Disciplinary Procedures of PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. Moorestown Tp. v. ArmstrongNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nini v. Mercer County Community CollegeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. Grubb v. Borough of HightstownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  3. Seacoast Builders Corp. v. Jackson Township Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  4. Morris Sheriff v. Morris PoliceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  5. State v. FrancisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API