Legal Opinion

Hartung v. Union Pac. R. Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1926No. 1255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

Martin H. Hartung, Administrator of the Estate of Charles F. Smith, sued the Union Pacific Railway Company for causing the death of said Smith on September I, 1921. At the conclusion of the testimony, the court directed the jury sitting in the ease to return a-verdict in favor of the railway company. This was done, and judgment was rendered for the defendant, from which the administrator appeals.

The salient facts are as follows: On the 1st day of September, 1921, and for a number of years prior thereto, Charles F. Smith, the decedent, was in the employ of said railway company…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hines v. SweeneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ellis's Administrator v. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northwest States Utilities Co. v. AshtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Loomis v. DahlemWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ford Motor Company v. ArguelloWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Ford Motor Company v. ArguelloWyoming Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API