Ford Motor Company v. Arguello
Wyoming Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Gray
JURISDICTION
I concur with the holding of the majority that the court had jurisdiction of Ford. In this connection the record discloses that from the outset Ford resisted and continues-to resist the action here on the ground that, as a non-qualified foreign corporation it was not subject to the jurisdiction of the-court. The contention presents an important question and in disposing of the matter we first turn to pertinent portions of the record. It appears from the record that the only service of process made upon Ford was-personal service of summons upon E. F.. Nieman, one of its employees,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.