Legal Opinion

Beardslee v. North Pacific Finance Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1931No. 22710. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

An automobile was purchased by the plaintiff on conditional sales contract. That contract was assigned by plaintiff’s vendor to the defendant, who seized the automobile because of plaintiff’s failure to pay certain installments at maturity. Plaintiff in stituted an action to recover from the defendant the automobile, or its alleged value of one thousand dollars. A bond was furnished by the plaintiff, a writ of replevin was issued, and the sheriff took possession of the automobile. The defendant gave a redelivery bond, and the possession of the automobile was restored to the defendant, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lundberg v. SwitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Yours Truly Biscuit Co. v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Fisher v. TiffinOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Calhoun v. Universal Credit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Crutcher v. Scott Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API