Legal Opinion

Judd v. Bernard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1956No. 33738PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The plaintiffs in this suit seek to enjoin the defendants, members of the state game commission, from poisoning the fish in Lake St. Clair, on which they are littoral owners. They alleged in their complaint that the killing of the fish would deprive them of their property rights in the fish and pollute the waters which they use for domestic purposes.

The cause was tried to the court, which entered findings of fact to which no error has been assigned. Neither has there been any assignment of error to the court’s failure to enter proposed findings of fact. The facts found, therefore, have become…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vail v. SeaborgWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. TiceWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Snively v. JaberWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. McMillan v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Wiegardt v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MierzWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Washington Kelpers Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kitsap County v. Kitsap Rifle & Revolver ClubCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Zarelli v. Superior Distributing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API