Legal Opinion

Schmiedicke v. Clare School Board

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1998No. Docket 197336PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right the lower court’s ruling that defendants did not violate the Open Meetings Act (OMA), MCL 15.261 et seq.; MSA 4.1800(11) et seq., when defendant Clare School Board’s Personnel and Policy Committee (ppc) 1 met in private to review methods for evaluating school administrators and the length of employment contracts with administrators and when there were private evaluations of the school district’s superintendent. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.

i

At its March 21, 1994, meeting, the seven-member defendant school board passed an amended motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wexford County Prosecutor v. PrangerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Menominee County Taxpayers Alliance, Inc v. Menominee County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Federated Publications, Inc. v. Board of TrusteesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Manning v. City of East TawasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Jocham v. Tuscola CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Davis v. City of Detroit Financial Review TeamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Nicholas v. Meridian Charter Township BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API