Legal Opinion
McClintock v. McEachin
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 30, 1947No. 4 Div. 420, 420-APublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The appeals are from final decrees in two cases, consolidated here by agreement. The bills were in equity to set aside two deeds made to appellee McEachin by Copeland and Cherry, respectively, as in fraud of appellant as a creditor of the two said grantors.
The case of McClintock v. McEachin, 246 Ala. 412, 20 So.2d 711, presents the first phase of this litigation where, on the allegations as made, appellant was held to be a simple creditor of said grantors, as the holder of a dormant judgment against them.
The evidence is without substantial dispute that McEachin paid a -fair…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. RoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- McClintock v. McEachinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Second Nat. Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio v. AllgoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Ledbetter v. Davenport Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Clear Creek, Inc. v. Royal American Corp. (In Re International Resorts, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984
- Headley v. HeadleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- United States v. GlascockDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.