Legal Opinion
Park v. Bender
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-2448Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHINOK PARK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-2448 (RDM) BRUCE M. BENDER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Shinok Park, proceeding pro se, filed this action against her former attorney, Bruce Bender, for fraud, unlawful detention of personal property, unjust enrichment, malpractice, spoliation of evidence, and breach of fiduciary duties. Dkt. 1 at 6. Bender moves to dismiss on the ground that Plaintiff’s suit is barred under the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. Dkt. 7 at 2. Park has since moved to amend her…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.