Legal Opinion

Sonnenberg v. Security Management Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 2, 1992No. 62, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The issue presented here on the pleadings is whether a deceit action will lie where the plaintiffs, who allegedly were fraudulently induced to contract to purchase realty, closed on their transactions after discovery of the fraud. The defendant dresses its argument in the garb of reliance, contending that consummation of the contract with full knowledge of the facts precludes, as a matter of law, reliance on any misrepresentation. This Court rejected the same argument more than a century ago when it was garbed somewhat differently, and we again reject the argument for the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McAleer v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. Whitney v. AllaireNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Piper v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  4. Whitney v. . AllaireNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  5. Foley v. CrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. GartenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Rozen v. GreenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Merritt v. CraigCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API