Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Harper

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1929No. 1239-5274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOritz, J.

We copy the following statement of the case from the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, which is reported in 7 S.W.(2d) 892:

“Suit by appellant, an Illinois corporation, against appellees Robert Harper, as principal, and J. D. Taylor, T. B. Stanford, and W. B. Stanford, as guarantors, for $1,158.84, alleged to be due appellant for Rawleigh products sold by appellant to appellee Robert Harper under and by virtue of the terms of a written contract. Appellees answered specially that the contract sued upon did not constitute the entire contract and agreement between appellant and appellee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. RobertsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Automatic MacH. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Harcrow v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API