National Automatic MacH. Co. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Appellant, as vendor, sued appellee, as purchaser, for $660.68, as the balance due on certain written contract of sale of boxing amusement machines, known as “K. O. Fighters,” which contract was attached as a part of the petition. The trial court sustained appellee’s special exception to the petition, on the ground that the contract was in violation of the anti-trust laws of Texas, and dismissed the action upon appellant’s refusal to amend; hence this appeal.
The material portions of the contract read as follows:
‘Whereas vendor manufactures and sells a coin operated boxing amusement device…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fuqua, Hinkle & Davis v. Pabst Brewing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Albertype Co. v. Gust Feist Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
- Caddell v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Segal v. McCall CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Patrizi v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Oliver v. Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Cardwell Investment Co., Inc., a Corporation v. United Supply & Manufacturing Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Rogers v. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- State v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.