Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1957No. 29,558PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, C. J.

The appellant was charged in the court below in two counts with the crime of assault and battery-sex, on a child of the age of twelve years. He was tried by the court without a jury. The court found the appellant guilty merely of assault and battery. The appellant directed a motion to quash against the affidavit on the grounds that each of the counts did not state the offense with sufficient certainty. Appellant’s contention in that regard was concerned with the language of the second portion of the statute that per tains to the sex characteristics of the offense alone. The statute reads as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hanes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Mattingly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Markiton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Knox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lamphier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jose Ernesto Flores v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Greer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Buttram v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Martin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Halligan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API