Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Hirsch

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1971No. 30432PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeenzlee, J.

On January 15, 1970, an affidavit was executed charging appellant Hirsch with violating the Lousing code of the city of Cleveland. The affidavit was based upon an inspection of appellant’s premises made on January 13, 1969, and alleged that certain violations had been committed on that date.

Appellant entered a plea of not guilty, the cause was heard, and appellant was found guilty. She filed a motion for a new trial, alleging for the first time that R. C. 1905-.33 * barred the prosecution. The motion was denied and appeal was taken to this court.

Appellant asserts that the affidavit by which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. John Christopher DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Kenneth E. Waters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. Elmer J. Benes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Eddie TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. State v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. HerschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Padie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Tucker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API