Legal Opinion

Henderson v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 26, 1913No. 1096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7429 (T. D. 33189).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The provisions of law involved in this case are paragraphs 480 and 683 of the tariff act of 1909, which we quote:

480. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of all raw or unmanufactured articles, not enumerated or provided for in this section, a duty of ten per centum ad valorem, and on all articles manufactured, in whole or in part, not provided for in this section, a duty of twenty per centum ad valorem.

683. Stone and sand: Burrstone in blocks, rough or unmanufactured; cliff stone, unmanufactured; rotten stone, tripoli, and sand, crude or manufactured, not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neuman & Schwiers Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  2. McEnany v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Cronin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. Thermal Syndicate, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Dollar Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API