Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided April 3, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Case 72 — AGREED CASE APPEAL PROM PAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT. The election of appellee in November, 1893, was unauthorized, and therefore appellant is entitled to hold the office until the election and qual- . ■ ilication of his successor as provided by law. (Secs. 160, 166,167 of the Constitution of Kentucky; seo. 1 of the schedule to the Constitution.) Cited: Secs. 148, 160 and 167 of the Constitution.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HAZELRIGG
delivered the opinion of the court.
Tlie controversy between tlie appellant and tlie appellee is shown by the following “ agreed case,” submitted by the parties to the lower court for adjudication, to-witp.
“ That on the first Saturday of March, 1892, and at the regular city election that year, defendant, I). Y. Johnson, was duly elected treasurer of the City of Lexington, and *416duly qualified as sucli on April 14, 1892, and has since that time held said office and discharged the duties thereof. That, at the regular election held on the 7th day of November, 1893, plaintiff, B. B.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Lafferty v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Fullerton v. MannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Boyd v. LandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
- Craft v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Jones v. WilshireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.